WP1
Project Management
Provides governance, quality assurance and coordination across the full project.
Supports the full project
Five connected Work Packages guide the project from coordination and Digital Wellbeing Suite development to cross-country experimentation, sustainability and European outreach.
Open each section to view the official lead partner, implementation period, objective, main activities, deliverables and expected results.
Ensures effective governance, quality, risk management and project-wide coordination.
To ensure that TechWell project is implemented efficiently, effectively and to a high quality, with clear governance, communication, monitoring and risk-management arrangements.
WP1 provides the coordination, monitoring and governance framework that supports all development, piloting, sustainability and communication activities.
Sets out the project’s management, governance, communication, quality and risk-management framework. It defines how the consortium works together, how decisions are made and how implementation risks are identified and managed.
Brings together the project’s monitoring, evaluation and data-governance arrangements. It documents implementation progress, independent evaluation findings and the rules for collecting, storing, sharing and protecting project data.
Develops the Digital Wellbeing Suite, stakeholder framework, implementation guidance and educational resources.
To develop a practical Digital Wellbeing Suite that supports schools through strategy, guidance, educational resources and an implementation roadmap.
WP2 provides the core tools, educational resources and implementation framework that move into real-school experimentation under WP3.
Defines the project’s approach to transnational capacity building and stakeholder engagement. It maps relevant actors, needs, practices and capacity gaps and provides the basis for building the International Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue.
Summarises the participatory workshops carried out in the partner countries and translates their findings into a common pilot implementation framework. It sets out user requirements, success criteria and the practical conditions for testing the Digital Wellbeing Suite in schools.
Packages the educational resources and implementation guidance needed for schools to apply the Digital Wellbeing Suite. It combines multilingual materials for school communities with a roadmap explaining how the approach can be introduced, adapted and sustained.
Tests, monitors and refines the Digital Wellbeing Suite in diverse school environments across six countries.
To test, refine and assess the Digital Wellbeing Suite in real school environments across different social, cultural and technological contexts.
WP3 transforms the outputs of WP2 into real-world evidence and provides findings to support sustainability, policy engagement and communication.
Documents how pilot schools are selected and establishes their starting point before experimentation begins. It records the selection criteria, school profiles, readiness conditions and baseline digital competence data for teachers and students.
Presents the monitoring evidence from the school pilots, identifies improvements needed in the Digital Wellbeing Suite and assesses the project’s final cross-country impact. It captures implementation lessons, outcomes and recommendations for future scaling.
Supports policy engagement, long-term use, partnerships and wider uptake of project results.
To maximise the long-term impact of TechWell by supporting policy engagement, cultural change, sustainability and wider use of the project results.
WP4 uses the evidence generated in WP3 and works with WP5 to ensure that project results remain visible, usable and sustainable beyond the pilot phase.
Analyses how the project supports policy engagement, cultural change and the long-term use of its results. It turns pilot evidence and stakeholder feedback into practical recommendations for sustainability, exploitation and wider policy uptake.
Formalises cooperation with relevant organisations and evaluates the overall impact of the project. It records collaboration commitments and assesses the effectiveness, achievements and future potential of the TechWell approach.
Builds project visibility, stakeholder engagement and wider awareness of TechWell results.
To maximise the visibility, outreach and impact of TechWell project through coordinated communication, dissemination and engagement activities.
WP5 translates technical and policy outputs from all Work Packages into clear, accessible communication for schools, stakeholders and wider European audiences.
Defines how TechWell communicates with schools, policymakers, stakeholders and the wider public. It brings together the communication and dissemination strategy, visual identity, website and online communication tools used throughout the project.
Documents the implementation and performance of the project’s dissemination campaigns. It reviews communication activities, audience reach, engagement data and lessons for improving future outreach.
TechWell follows a connected process from project coordination and resource development to school piloting, evaluation, sustainability and dissemination.
Provides governance, quality assurance and coordination across the full project.
Supports the full projectCreates the Digital Wellbeing Suite, implementation guidance and educational resources.
Design and developmentTests and refines the Digital Wellbeing Suite in participating schools across six countries.
Testing and evaluationTurns project evidence into sustainability, policy engagement and wider uptake.
Impact and sustainabilityShares project activities, resources and results with target audiences and stakeholders.
Connects all WPs with stakeholdersContinue to the Project Results page, the Digital Wellbeing Suite or the Educational Materials developed for schools.
Project „A Holistic Strategy for Digital Wellness in Schools”
Project number: 101195919
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.